Question 1

Does KRYOS v6 validate scientific claims?

Accepted Answer

No. The framework structures evidence, attacks measurement validity, plans experiments, and packages results for independent replication. Validation comes from experiments and independent replication performed by qualified teams, reviewed by accountable humans.

Question 2

What materials do you need to begin?

Accepted Answer

Initial contact requires non-sensitive scoping information only. Approved research materials are requested through a controlled channel after qualification, never through a public form.

Question 3

Does the framework make decisions autonomously?

Accepted Answer

No. Every gate has a named human reviewer, and every executive option carries an owner and a reversal condition. Outputs are decision-support artifacts.

Question 4

How is uncertainty represented?

Accepted Answer

Through an explicit evidence-label system covering document, data, experimental, and replication support, plus model-inferred, hypothesis, speculative, contradicted, and quarantined states. Labels are descriptive, never aggregated into a score.

Question 5

What happens to results that contradict the programme's position?

Accepted Answer

They are entered in the contradiction register with a named owner and a review date, and they appear in every executive output until resolved with evidence.

Question 6

How do you handle dual-use and export considerations?

Accepted Answer

A compliance gate screens every outbound artifact at a governance-safe level of detail and records a named determination. This is advisory; institutional legal and export authority decides.

Question 7

Can you guarantee confidentiality?

Accepted Answer

No engagement should rely on a website's assurances. Confidentiality terms are agreed contractually before any materials move, and public forms are explicitly limited to non-sensitive scoping information.

Question 8

What does a pilot actually deliver?

Accepted Answer

A bounded 21–30 day engagement produces an evidence register, ontology, model card, artifact elimination report, experiment queue, contradiction register, red-team verdict, and an executive decision packet, with a stated continue, pause, or stop recommendation.

Does KRYOS v6 validate scientific claims?−

What materials do you need to begin?+

Does the framework make decisions autonomously?+

How is uncertainty represented?+

What happens to results that contradict the programme's position?+

How do you handle dual-use and export considerations?+

Can you guarantee confidentiality?+

What does a pilot actually deliver?+