Skip to main content
James Scott Institute for Adversarial Frontier Physics

Samples

What the output looks like

These are synthetic samples. They exist so that the structure of an Institute record can be examined without any partner material being disclosed. They contain no laboratory data and correspond to no real experiment, group, or instrument.

Status
Synthetic constructions
Purpose
Show record structure
Data content
None
Applies to
All review programmes

Sample A

Claim ledger with registers

The primary output. A claim is entered once, then linked to the evidence supporting it, the records contradicting it, the uncertainty attached to each quantity, the replication attempts, the decision state, and the revision history.

Evidence record · synthetic case JSI-SYN-014

Sample claim ledger

rev v1.2 · 12 sections · 1 correction

C₁

Reported claim

Decision-relevant

A narrow spectral feature at 4.21 arb. units indicates an unmodelled transition in the target species. Decomposed into three separable assertions: the feature exists; it originates in the sample; it cannot be assigned to a known transition.

Relations

Linked figure · none for this section

This section carries no figure. Select a relation on an evidence record to bring its figure into view.

Synthetic demonstration for public education. Case JSI-SYN-014 describes no real laboratory, dataset, or programme.

Sample B

Reconstructed uncertainty budget

Produced by a measurement and uncertainty audit. Terms are separated, combined only where independence holds, and the dominant contributor is named — because that is where effort changes the interval.

Figure 4

How uncertainty changes a claim

Synthetic

A synthetic measurement chain runs from instrument to interpretation. Adjust the predefined uncertainty terms and observe the combined standard uncertainty, the expanded interval, the dominant contributor, and the interpretive state that the evidence then permits.

Interactive uncertainty budget. Combined standard uncertainty 0.023, expanded interval plus or minus 0.045, dominant contributor Environmental correction, interpretive state: Marginal.

InstrumentCalibrationEnvironmentdominant termTransformDerivedInterpretationTraceability chain: each stage contributes systematic and random terms.

Readout noise, reducible by averaging.

Traceability of the reference used.

Not reducible by additional averaging.

Model used to convert raw to derived quantity.

Uncertainty budget — contribution chart

  • Instrument0.008
  • Calibration0.012
  • Environmental correction0.017
  • Transformation0.004

Combined standard uncertainty (quadrature): 0.023 · solid bars: systematic · dashed outline: random

Combined standard uncertainty
± 0.023 arb. units
Expanded interval (k = 2)
± 0.045 arb. units
Claimed effect size
0.052 arb. units
Dominant contributor
Environmental correction (systematic)
Effect ÷ expanded interval
1.15

Interpretive state

Marginal

The claimed effect and the expanded uncertainty are comparable. A stronger constraint is required before interpretation.

SyntheticMeasuredUnresolved

Sample C

Replication topology

Produced by a replication design review. Attempts are recorded as a structure with their independence and sensitivity stated, so that failure to reproduce is never silently treated as falsification, and dependent agreement is never counted as confirmation.

Figure 7

Replication topology

Synthetic

Attempts are recorded as a topology rather than a count. The distinction between failure to reproduce and evidence of falsification is maintained explicitly, as is the distinction between independent replication and dependent agreement.

Replication tree with six nodes: original observation, independent replication, partial replication, failed replication, methodological divergence, and a superseded attempt. Currently selected: S₃ failed replication.

S0originalS1independentS2partialS3failedS4divergentS5supersededDiamond: failed with demonstrated sensitivity · dashed circle: partial or divergent · dotted box: superseded

S₃ failed replication

Contradicted
Protocol relationship
Reference protocol, independent apparatus of a different design.
Changed conditions
Dispersive principle differs from the original instrument.
Measurement differences
No feature above stated sensitivity in the same window.
Uncertainty
Sensitivity established in advance and sufficient to detect the original effect.
Evidentiary implication
Failure to reproduce with demonstrated sensitivity. This is evidence against the claim — but it is not the same as falsification of the underlying physics.
SyntheticReplicatedContradictedUnresolvedSuperseded

Structure

Every record answers the same questions

01
What is claimed, decomposed into propositions that can fail separately.
02
What supports each proposition, and with what evidentiary state.
03
What contradicts it, with the provenance of each contradicting record.
04
Which assumptions carry the conclusion.
05
What observation would falsify it.
06
Where the primary bottleneck sits.
07
The cheapest decisive next action.
08
The release state the evidence justifies, with conditions and dissent.

All three samples on this page are synthetic. Identifiers, values, instruments, and attempts in them are constructed for demonstration only.